Re: 7.0-> 7.1: any reasons for switching from {4,5,6}.0.x scheme?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: 7.0-> 7.1: any reasons for switching from {4,5,6}.0.x scheme?
From: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:44:22 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 51BF3CE6.7040207@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E1UocMg-00073p-3O@drop.zugschlus.de>
References: <[🔎] CAOo+eVpHpYwhB5PwUFh9bQ0friUqcTDcdaqo+BQMCyd8whNW3g@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20130617111457.GG22521@halon.org.uk> <[🔎] E1UocMg-00073p-3O@drop.zugschlus.de>

On 17/06/13 17:33, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:14:57 +0100, Neil McGovern <neil@halon.org.uk>
> wrote:
>> Given that the middle '0' was redundant, and we now do X.0 for all
>> major releases, it was simply removed.
> 
> So sarge was a point release of woody?

Neil did say "now". sarge was 8 years ago.

    S

Reply to:

References:
- 7.0-> 7.1: any reasons for switching from {4,5,6}.0.x scheme?
  - From: Praveen A <pravi.a@gmail.com>
- Re: 7.0-> 7.1: any reasons for switching from {4,5,6}.0.x scheme?
  - From: Neil McGovern <neil@halon.org.uk>
- Re: 7.0-> 7.1: any reasons for switching from {4,5,6}.0.x scheme?
  - From: Marc Haber <mh+debian-devel@zugschlus.de>

Prev by Date: Re: 7.0-> 7.1: any reasons for switching from {4,5,6}.0.x scheme?
Next by Date: Re: 7.0-> 7.1: any reasons for switching from {4,5,6}.0.x scheme?
Previous by thread: Re: 7.0-> 7.1: any reasons for switching from {4,5,6}.0.x scheme?
Next by thread: Re: 7.0-> 7.1: any reasons for switching from {4,5,6}.0.x scheme?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread