Re: X.509 and CA certificates for other purposes (i.e. the IGTF)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: X.509 and CA certificates for other purposes (i.e. the IGTF)
From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:04:08 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 1370855048.3721.245.camel@pi0307572>
In-reply-to: <CAE2SPAZaV0px6cSDYP1CZxHEs0qJZBm+mEBGztaFH6+Vc9bCuA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <519F41BD.10108@nikhef.nl> <20130525122708.GA29404@falafel.plessy.net> <CAE2SPAZaV0px6cSDYP1CZxHEs0qJZBm+mEBGztaFH6+Vc9bCuA@mail.gmail.com>

Le dimanche 26 mai 2013 à 20:02 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : 
> Maybe crypto consolidation arround libnss will greatly help here.
> jessie release goal ?

If we consolidate on a crypto library, it would be good for it to use
ca-certificates and not a pre-compiled list of certificates.

-- 
 .''`.      Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'
  `-

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: X.509 and CA certificates for other purposes (i.e. the IGTF)
  - From: Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bastien@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Survey answers part 1: systemd has too many dependencies, …
Next by Date: Re: Bug#711570: ITP: libsdl2-mixer -- Mixer library for SDL2
Previous by thread: Re: libnss consolidation (was: Re: X.509 and CA certificates for other purposes (i.e. the IGTF))
Next by thread: Re: X.509 and CA certificates for other purposes (i.e. the IGTF)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread