[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Switching to mozilla ESR in stable-security



Ansgar Burchardt <ansgar@debian.org> schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/28/2013 22:33, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> As such, we'll switch to releasing the ESR releases of iceweasel
>> and icedove in stable-security. 
>> Reverse-deps of the older xulrunner libs have negligable security
>> impact and we won't update them any further.
>> 
>> One problematic aspect are the various xul-ext-* packages currently
>> packaged. It's very likely that some of them will break with ESR17
>> and ESR24 in the future.
>> 
>> However, there's not much we can do here. We can select a narrow (!)
>> set of important addons (e.g. enigmail for Icedove) that we will
>> keep in sync through stable-security, but that doesn't scale for
>> the full scale of Mozilla extensions currently packaged.
>> 
>> In the future the majority of packages should thus rather be installed
>> through http://addons.mozilla.org instead of Debian packages.
>
> As mentioned on IRC, I wonder what we should do with these extentions
> now and for future releases. There seem to be several options:
>
> a) Remove most Mozilla extensions from stable/testing/unstable and
>    let users install them from addons.mozilla.org.
>
>    Important addons could stay if agreed with release and/or security
>    teams, e.g. enigmail (mentioned above) or adblock (part of the
>    default Debian GNOME installation).
>
> b) Let maintainers update extensions via either -security or
>    -(proposed-)updates.
>    This causes additional work for the security team or the release
>    team for at least coordinating updates. I wouldn't expect them to
>    be able to review the changes which means a break from our current
>    stable policy.
>
> b2) like b), but only do so for jessie and remove the extensions from
>    testing/unstable.
>
> c) Let maintainers provide updated extensions via an additional
>    repository (e.g. mozilla.d.n or some developer repository).

(c) is my prefered way to move forward. We'll release enigmail in sync
with icedove once icedove is ready.

Cheers,
        Moritz


Reply to: