On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:22:22PM +0200, Martin Wuertele wrote: > Actually it's just a response to the ongoing insulting by joss to > variouse participants on mailinglists. As usual he has a way of mailing > that i find disgusting. I don't find yours to be much better. > > You know why many projects are adopting many technologies that > > are developed by RedHat people? It's because RedHat is an excellent > > upstream and they are one of the largest contributors to the whole > > Linux software stack, be it the kernel or anything above. > In many projects yes, in some no. Current kernel development, tough an > understandable way to compete with Oracle, is not as cooperative as it > was. There are more projects than kernel patches, though. And they argued that they contribute to upstream, which is true, although the backport situation is nothing to be proud of, I agree. There are a bunch of projects started by RedHat (not in private as systemd) that are useful to the community. See http://et.redhat.com/ for instance. > Actually in ubuntu happened a lot of multiarch development before it > ended up in debian. And we still need to cope with the problems Ubuntu didn't have by design. ;-) > Actually that is not true. With some projects they both do a good job > while with others they suck, it depends mainly on the actual persons > involved. As with RedHat, I guess. Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature