Re: Debian systemd survey
* John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> [2013-05-22 20:57]:
> On 05/22/2013 07:50 PM, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> >Actually it sounds like you propose to stop developing and take
> >everything from Redhat, Lennart, Gnome because it's there and they say
> >so.
>
> And another one. Why is it that almost anyone who isn't favor of
> systemd is directly going off insulting their developers or any
> of the organizations behind of it?
Actually it's just a response to the ongoing insulting by joss to
variouse participants on mailinglists. As usual he has a way of mailing
that i find disgusting.
> You know why many projects are adopting many technologies that
> are developed by RedHat people? It's because RedHat is an excellent
> upstream and they are one of the largest contributors to the whole
> Linux software stack, be it the kernel or anything above.
In many projects yes, in some no. Current kernel development, tough an
understandable way to compete with Oracle, is not as cooperative as it
was.
> Distributions would adopt more innovative and useful technologies
> developed by Canonical, for example, if there were any. I can't
> actually think of anything by Canonical which has been widely
> adopted outside Ubuntu.
Actually in ubuntu happened a lot of multiarch development before it
ended up in debian.
> Blame Canonical for being a bad upstream, not RedHat for being
> a good one!
Actually that is not true. With some projects they both do a good job
while with others they suck, it depends mainly on the actual persons
involved.
Reply to: