[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#709237: ITP: meta-suckless-tools -- meta-package installs simple commands for minimalistic window managers

]] Dmitry Papchenkoff 

> Additionally, there was requests for packaging for xssstatus, which is
> (by upstream) a part of suckless-tools too, but (as for other
> suckless-tools) have separate tarball. For example, if xsstools will
> be included in main package, then «tools for minimalist window
> managers» will depend on xscreensaver even if they also includes dumb
> x locker. So, at least two or three of the tools already have reasons
> for making separate packages for them, that's not good — it's better
> then packages for one vendor organized in some common way.

You don't need to depend if only a minor functionality of the package
depends on some other package, a suggests is fine.  See

With 3.0 (quilt), you can have multiple upstream tarballs too.

Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are

Reply to: