Re: git as a source package format?
On 04/05/13 08:17, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On 04-05-13 05:04, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> In any case, please refrain passive-aggressive statements on other people's
> Except that this time the "project" we're talking about was one person
> asking another person "can you clarify what I meant?", which seems to
> make no sense, at all. If you want clarification, provide it about your
> own statements, thankyouverymuch.
To be precise, "can you clarify what you thought I meant?"