Hi Abou, are you the original submitter? On Montag, 29. April 2013, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > I'm not convinced this is the right way to proceed with this bug. I'm > CCing d-d@l.d.o to get more advices, but I'd prefer to keep the bug open > for tracking and release Wheezy with it open rather than hide it because > one have a workaround. Technically, you and I and everybody can reopen this bug, but practically I think it would be better if you file a new one, where you describe the issue short and to the point. As it is, this bug report is cluttered with your description how to setup wicd and /etc/network/interfaces - which hides the problem you had with network-manager. Hint: "it doesnt work" is not a good bug report. > Also the fact the N-M is completely buggy That's just wrong (but there is a vocal group on d-devel who will shout "hell yeah!", so enjoy). > does not mean we should hide > its bugs, this will not help at all. We'd rather keep them open and ask > hacker for help. Looking at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=network-manager I dont think we're activly hiding problems with network-manager (or any other software for that matter). cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.