Re: alternative debian/rules
On 04/22/2013 06:09 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> #690381
Gosh, what a shocking thread...
I didn't read until end, but nearly at half of it, it felt bad already.
> Thorsten, you should have kept your custom debian/rules. If it
> prevented incompetent developers from NMUing the package, then all
> good for you and for Debian.
Agreed. Especially when I see that this:
echo .nr g 2 | cat - cpio.1 | \
gzip -n9 >debian/pax/usr/share/man/man1/paxcpio.1.gz
is called "obfuscation", then doom it as unacceptable for the archive.
Thomas
Reply to: