On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 13:28 +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: > Fossology seems to have been removed because it was un-maintained, > (ITP #483297 then RoQA #656591 at version 1.1.0). > But upstream looks (very) active and released version 2.1.0 three months ago. > Paul, do you think it is worth bringing it back in debian now ? I discussed this with the former maintainer before it was removed, he said that the new upstream are making policy violating changes. Not encouraging but I'm am not able to evaluate his statements though. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part