On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 04:35:23PM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote: > We may want to make sure that this file loads fine in Free Software > graphics svg-based programs and maybe convert it to either a more > generic svg file, or at least something free (Inkscape might be a good > candidate for this). Agreed. > Any thoughts ? How about "patches welcome"? :) This is not meant to be tongue-in-cheek, but a very pragmatic suggestion. I'm no SVG expert either, but AFAICT all the "source" info are indeed in that .svg file, it is "just" that due to some minor syntactic issues (I speculate: due to the age of the .svg in question) it doesn't work properly with current version of popular FOSS SVG editors. Let's "just" find SVG experts in our community and ask them to fix the source code. Posting a call for help about this on -dekstop might actually be a useful way forward. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Debian Project Leader . . . . . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature