Re: choice in core infrastructure decisions (Re: Bug#684396: ITP: openrc -- alternative boot mechanism)
On 13.08.2012 00:50, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 12, Roger Leigh <rleigh@codelibre.net> wrote:
>
>> Not good. Time to look a bit more seriously at mdev then?
> Waste of time, mdev lacks critical features like modules autoloading so
> it is laughable to argue that it is a credible udev replacement for
It is laughable to argue that module autoloading is any more complex
than a call to `modprobe $MODALIAS'.
Thanks,
/mjt
Reply to: