On Aug 12, Roger Leigh <rleigh@codelibre.net> wrote: > Not good. Time to look a bit more seriously at mdev then? Waste of time, mdev lacks critical features like modules autoloading so it is laughable to argue that it is a credible udev replacement for any use case except (some) embedded systems. If the time will come the interested parties will fork udev, but let's not overreact. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature