Re: usefulness of ITPs (Re: mosh ITP not done, just package name taken over)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: usefulness of ITPs (Re: mosh ITP not done, just package name taken over)
From: Jon Dowland <jmtd@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:17:13 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20120415221713.GA24051@debian>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1334398351.16637.16.camel@claudin.sermisy.org>
References: <[🔎] CAKTje6E9zgLkAoQZmNfHgWWJNmjGAqpYJE+Zc3Nvw4qy8u-jNQ@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] E1SIy6b-00007u-Cf@port-kdr.hamilton.local> <[🔎] CAKTje6G41H_Ra16PS-kD0e1fAH9MyqD_cyX+Pj-bMfLTww1aZw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 1334398351.16637.16.camel@claudin.sermisy.org>

I'd lke to see the ITP be MUST but the ITP template be SHOULD.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: usefulness of ITPs (Re: mosh ITP not done, just package name taken over)
  - From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
- Re: usefulness of ITPs (Re: mosh ITP not done, just package name taken over)
  - From: "Barak A. Pearlmutter" <barak@cs.nuim.ie>
- Re: usefulness of ITPs (Re: mosh ITP not done, just package name taken over)
  - From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
- Re: usefulness of ITPs (Re: mosh ITP not done, just package name taken over)
  - From: Moray Allan <moray@sermisy.org>

Prev by Date: Re: wine-unstable in Debian
Next by Date: Re: Bug#668556: ITP: dparser -- a scannerless GLR parser generator
Previous by thread: Re: usefulness of ITPs (Re: mosh ITP not done, just package name taken over)
Next by thread: Re: usefulness of ITPs (Re: mosh ITP not done, just package name taken over)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread