Re: Doesn't contain source for waf binary code
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:59:30 +1100, Karl Goetz <karl@kgoetz.id.au> wrote:
> I don't know anything about waf not mentioned in this thread, but
> would it be possible to patch the package to work with a packaged waf
> instead?
> thanks,
> kk
>
See the reasons for removal previously referenced by Alexander:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/02/msg00714.html and the URLs
referenced from there. waf upstream is hostile to this idea to the
point that he intentionally changed the documentation licence to a
non-free license in order to discourage us.
stew
Reply to: