[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Patch Tagging Guidelines: DEP-3 moved to ACCEPTED status



On 2012-01-16 16:43, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
Jonathan Wiltshire, 2012-01-16 17:01+0100:
It is only a small thing but I did not realise DEP-3 was still a
candidate or I would have spoken earlier. A CVE field, mandatory if a CVE has been published for this patch and is the major component of this
patch, would allow easy tracing of patches back to CVE publications
later (for review perhaps, or by other distributions).

Then it would be better to make it independant from CVE, since they
are not the only security vulnerability database.

Ack; but we (in the security team) only track CVE really. The Debian bug number is useful but only within Debian, the CVE identifier is cross-distribution.



--
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51


Reply to: