I just see that propose of removal gnome-dvb-daemon just after I made a RFA to it... Nice! :-D I agree that the problem of gnome-dvb-daemon its related to #674156 as Simon stated. Are all the packages affected by this issue going to be removed from testing? In addition, I will package the newer upstream version of the gnome-dvb-daemon, but I think that it still suffer the broken-ABI problem. Best regards On 30/11/12 17:22, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 30.11.2012 13:03, Simon McVittie wrote: >> Suggested options include: >> >> A) Consider the new ABI to be "right". Recompile every package that >> mentions the affected structs (including everything that >> subclasses GstElement), unless it has already been compiled >> against GLib 2.32 on every architecture. >> >> +: Every frequently-uploaded package, including large ones like >> Webkit, Qt and the Mozilla suite, have already been compiled >> against GLib 2.32 in practice anyway. The most significant >> exception that I noticed is GStreamer 0.10, which is where we >> noticed this ABI break: the problem is that "core" GStreamer has >> not been recompiled since, but some packages that subclass its >> objects have. >> >> -: Binaries built against squeeze's GLib on the affected >> architectures will break, in relatively rare circumstances[2]. >> We have to recompile up to 227 source packages. > > I think this is basically what was suggested in > <20121130125125.GS5634@radis.cristau.org>, with the negative point being > addressed by adding Breaks: for those cases we can identify. > > Regards, > > Adam > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature