Re: Question: Packages.xz and Contents-<arch>.xz
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 17:11:02 +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> > 0.8.10.3+squeeze1 does as its changelog tells us.
> > Note through that it needs the 'xz' binary for that (as it did for bzip2,
> > that changed just yet with the usage of libbz2 now for wheezy and as
> > usual people complain about it …). xz is priority required though so
> > this is most likely not that much of an issue as it was for bzip2.
> Although xz-utils is currently priority required, it should really go
> back to optional, as dpkg stopped Pre-Depending on it some time ago.
More like it should be in standard nowadays, along with bzip2.
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot