Re: A common configuration format, anyone?
On 14 November 2012 15:31, Benjamin Drung <email@example.com> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 14.11.2012, 15:32 +0400 schrieb Игорь Пашев:
>> 2012/11/14 Philip Ashmore <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> simple format which, like xml, is human-readable
>> XML is not human-readable :-)
> XML is human-readable, but in most cases ugly to write. IMO XML is not
Also XML is not "diff-able" easily, which is usual for tree-like structures.
In XML defence, at least it's not "write once" / "write only" format
the way perl is ;-)