Re: [PROPOSAL v2] Orphaning another maintainer's packages
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL v2] Orphaning another maintainer's packages
- From: Tollef Fog Heen <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 21:41:20 +0100
- Message-id: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Mail-followup-to: email@example.com
- In-reply-to: <CANTw=MOkBMNwXg1RZimYOLZnFfnGaJ1=Gx4DhSvzWVKJXqMzWQ@mail.gmail.com> (Michael Gilbert's message of "Thu, 1 Nov 2012 15:23:07 -0400")
- References: <20121027093615.GA27593@xanadu.blop.info> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20121030135212.GA10585@an3as.eu> <email@example.com> <20121031070545.GB32333@an3as.eu> <20121031080420.GB11941@client.brlink.eu> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20121031183400.GA17521@master.debian.org> <CANTw=MNCgtiFWg9XC6ZJf9Pp+O67njyxf=xP7Uyv6GOdy0Z3jg@mail.gmail.com> <email@example.com> <CANTw=MO6TO6mqp4VAsc4EaOgfLQXNM5h=ZsHHjWuNwd4Ayxivg@mail.gmail.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <CANTw=MOkBMNwXg1RZimYOLZnFfnGaJ1=Gx4DhSvzWVKJXqMzWQ@mail.gmail.com>
]] Michael Gilbert
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> >> > The new upstream release did not include any particularly compelling
> >> > changes for wheezy, which is why I did not update to the newer
> >> > upstream version.
> >> It may not have include changes interesting to you, but there was
> >> certainly interest to others in the hurd improvements, and I think we
> >> should really try to be accommodating to hurd porters as much as
> >> possible.
> > «For wheezy» is operative in my statement. hurd is not a wheezy release
> > architecture, and it's actually not even part of Debian any longer any
> > more than HPPA or AVR32 is. Making changes for such architectures, when
> > we're approaching a freeze, is pretty high on my «stuff I'm not going to
> > spend time on» list.
> That's where nmus help.
I think you misunderstood me. Given there already existed a package in
the archive, which was in good shape for the release, changing that
package would be a bad idea. Every change carries risk with it, however
small. Whether it's the maintainer or an NMUer making that change is
> Someone that does care and does have the time can go ahead and get the
> features interesting them (and likely many other users) to work.
I find it hard to classify a port that has a number of popcon
submissions somewhere between alpha and sh4 as having «many users».
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are