Re: [SUMMARY/PROPOSAL] Orphaning another maintainer's packages

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [SUMMARY/PROPOSAL] Orphaning another maintainer's packages
From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 02:00:49 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 50882CD1.9060903@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20121024161524.GB26811@virgil.dodds.net>
References: <[🔎] 20121023092743.GA11817@xanadu.blop.info> <[🔎] 20121023124039.GA22407@upsilon.cc> <[🔎] 20121023204016.GA21394@virgil.dodds.net> <[🔎] 87zk3caxpj.fsf@algernon.balabit> <[🔎] 20121024161524.GB26811@virgil.dodds.net>

On 10/25/2012 12:15 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:

No, it makes the process based on *consensus*, which is a minimumrequirement.


How many people should send ACKs in this system?

- If it's a lot of people, then it's hard to hunt for so many.
- If it's not a lot of people, then it hardly can be called a consensus.

Thomas

Reply to:

References:
- [SUMMARY/PROPOSAL] Orphaning another maintainer's packages
  - From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
- Re: [SUMMARY/PROPOSAL] Orphaning another maintainer's packages
  - From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>
- Re: [SUMMARY/PROPOSAL] Orphaning another maintainer's packages
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: [SUMMARY/PROPOSAL] Orphaning another maintainer's packages
  - From: Gergely Nagy <algernon@balabit.hu>
- Re: [SUMMARY/PROPOSAL] Orphaning another maintainer's packages
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [SUMMARY/PROPOSAL] Orphaning another maintainer's packages
Next by Date: Re: [SUMMARY/PROPOSAL] Orphaning another maintainer's packages
Previous by thread: Re: [SUMMARY/PROPOSAL] Orphaning another maintainer's packages
Next by thread: Re: [SUMMARY/PROPOSAL] Orphaning another maintainer's packages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread