[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: choice in core infrastructure decisions (Re: Bug#684396: ITP: openrc -- alternative boot mechanism)

On Aug 12, Roger Leigh <rleigh@codelibre.net> wrote:

> Not good.  Time to look a bit more seriously at mdev then?
Waste of time, mdev lacks critical features like modules autoloading so 
it is laughable to argue that it is a credible udev replacement for 
any use case except (some) embedded systems.

If the time will come the interested parties will fork udev, but let's 
not overreact.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: