Re: Modified http://wiki.debian.org/DebianDeveloper to mention non-packagers (Re: [CTTE #614907] Resolution of node/nodejs conflict)
Stefano Zacchiroli <email@example.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:49:06AM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>> Our constitution does not talk about project members, and instead uses
>> the word "developer".
> In fact, the Constitution uses interchangeably "member" and "developer".
> (And that is one of the basis for the slow shift towards "member" in
> places like nm.d.o and elsewhere. It is correct to do so, constitution
> wise, and it exerts less communication emphasis on the activity of
> [technical] development.)
We are in the process of discussing a variety of constitutional amendments
to be raised by the tech-ctte that will hopefully end up creating a sort
of bundle of constitutional fixes to vote on. Perhaps it would be good to
include in that a terminology standardization on member for the places in
the constitution that we refer to voting project members rather than
specifically people who upload software.
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>