[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re: Re: Re: [CTTE #614907] Resolution of node/nodejs conflict

Steve Langasek wrote:

On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 07:33:37PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
>  Steve Langasek wrote:
>  >On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 04:38:21PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
>  >>   Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>  >>   >On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:07:15PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
>  >>   >>    Thank you, but I would appreciate if debian-devel-announce would
>  >>   >>    stay dedicated to important announcements which may be useful for a
>  >>   >>    wide range of developers.

>  >>   >tech-ctte resolutions do fit that bill. The tech-ctte is the highest
>  >>   >dispute resolution body we have in Debian, and I think their doings
>  >>   >deserve this level of awareness in the project.

>  >>   although publicity of some resolutions may indeed be useful for a
>  >>   wide range of developers, I fail to see many who would be interested
>  >>   in the resolution on node.

>  >Feel free to filter out mails sent by members of the technical committee to
>  >debian-devel-announce; I will be happy to reciprocate.
>  Thank you; also feel free to offer solutions which would be half
>  accurate, and consider that there are over 5000 subscribers to
>  debian-devel-announce.

Ok, let me be a little clearer.

The purpose of debian-devel-announce is for communicating announcements *to
people involved with the development of Debian*.

You are not a Debian developer.

I am.


Your lone opinion is therefore *entirely* irrelevant to the question of how
the debian-devel-announce mailing list is used.  If there were support for
your position from other DDs, it would be worth discussing.  There hasn't
been any such support, yet you've persisted in asserting the mailing list
content should be adapted to your personal preferences.

You would have done well to recognize that yours was a lone opinion and find
a way to adapt your habits to the majority view instead of demanding the
converse.  You have failed to do so, and in the process have made yourself a
nuisance.  You have now wasted far more of Debian's time with this little
d-d-a jihad than could possibly have been wasted by the original

Lone opinion? d-d-a jihad?

Welcome to my kill file.

You would have done well to see the code of conduct and find a way to adapt your communication style to the majority view.

Reply to: