Re: duplicates in the archive
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: duplicates in the archive
- From: Adam Borowski <email@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 16:48:01 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120708144801.GA24820@angband.pl>
- In-reply-to: <20120627082338.GA5555@spike.0x539.de>
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <4FE74EE0.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <4FE75F99.firstname.lastname@example.org> <1340569299.29283.0.camel@tomoyo> <20120624215814.GA32267@angband.pl> <email@example.com> <1340620722.5945.3.camel@x60> <20120627082338.GA5555@spike.0x539.de>
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:23:38AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:38:42PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > Which wm does that? I know it isn't gnome-shell at least, as I've been
> > > using it quite successfully without nm installed.
> > Have you tried to use evolution without NM?
Evolution seems to work just fine.
> I didn't try but it only suggests network-manager. However some applications do
> behave weird if you just deinstalled n-m (pidgin for instance), because they
> assume that you're not connected. After a reboot (maybe dbus restart is enough)
> they certainly connect again, though.
I tested a good part of Gnome today without n-m and it appears there are no
regressions at all. The only differences are:
* it gets rid of n-m icon in the systray (duh)
The dependency comes via gnome-core depending on network-manager-gnome.
> Kind regards
> Philipp Kern
I was born an ugly, dumb and work-loving child, then an evil midwife
replaced me in the crib.