On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:08:53PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > As mentioned in the last mail we sent to d-d-a (and several at > various points before that) if you have serious concerns that > important updates to your package won't be included in the release, > the correct approach is to talk to us, not try and work around us. > The net effect of the above is more likely to be that the urgency > will be overriden on the britney side as if the package had been > uploaded with a lower urgency. > For information, I've added some more age-days 10 hints today. If you need a higher urgency, please mention why in the changelog. Otherwise I have to go through every bug you mention in it, and when I don't see anything that looks like it justifies a higher urgency, I'm having to assume it was uploaded with that urgency in error. Thanks, Neil --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature