[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: On the (ab)use of the Urgency field

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:08:53PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> As mentioned in the last mail we sent to d-d-a (and several at
> various points before that) if you have serious concerns that
> important updates to your package won't be included in the release,
> the correct approach is to talk to us, not try and work around us.
> The net effect of the above is more likely to be that the urgency
> will be overriden on the britney side as if the package had been
> uploaded with a lower urgency.

For information, I've added some more age-days 10 hints today. If you
need a higher urgency, please mention why in the changelog.

Otherwise I have to go through every bug you mention in it, and when I
don't see anything that looks like it justifies a higher urgency, I'm
having to assume it was uploaded with that urgency in error.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: