Re: Idea: mount /tmp to tmpfs depending on free space and RAM
Stephan Seitz <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:33:13AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>Personally I thing DVD ISO images (downloaded) belong in your $HOME
> Donâ??t you think this is getting quite ridiculous? Big temporary
> files belong in your $HOME, but small temporary files in /tmp? Only to
> switch /tmp from disk to RAM?
No, I just don't consider a 4.7GiB download a temporary thing. I still
have the mindset that that should take time, cost money and therefore be
precious and should not be lost on reboot.
>>somewhere. And locally generated should just pipe the image to the
>>burner unless you want to upload the image somewhere, in which case
> Or you want to keep it safe, until you are sure the burned DVD is
> Of course, if I want to keep the ISO it will be stored in $HOME, but
> then it isnâ??t a *temporary* file anymore. And /tmp *is* for
> temporary files.
>>$HOME again. Just imagine a power failure after you painstackingly
>>uploaded 99.9% of the iso and then you have to start from scratch again
>>because a reboot cleans /tmp.
> TMPTIME exists and can be set according to your needs and your safety
Yeah, as noticed somewhere else TMPTIME conflicts with tmpfs. Didn't
even know that variable existed. So many hidden magic things to
configure stuff ...
>>Just out of interest: Do you have /tmp on /? Because if you do already
>>have a seperate /tmp partition then that obviously stays used.
> I always have separate partitions for /, /usr, /var, /tmp, /usr/local
> and /home (allright, with crappy software like udev and Co. which
> starts wanting files in /usr needlessy at the early boot stages, I
> will merge / and /usr in time). It isnâ??t a problem for me.
> But we are talking about defaults. You wish to tell new users that
> there two TB disk canâ??t really be used as they wish because Debian
> has a strange distinction between temporary files belonging in /tmp
> and temporary files donâ??t belonging in /tmp?
But does the default have to be maximised for the dumbest possible user?
Or should the default rather be for the intelligent user doing the right
> According to the discussion the installer will create one partition
> for swap and one for /. If this is true then the standard user has far
> more space on disk than he has RAM.
Just wait one more release and it will only be one partition with swap
files. And lets give that partition a drive letter like "C:\". :)
I realy don't like the direction DI is taking there.
> Shade and sweet water!