Re: amd64 as default architecture
- To: Ben Hutchings <email@example.com>
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, Debian kernel maintainers <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: amd64 as default architecture
- From: Goswin von Brederlow <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 11:59:52 +0200
- Message-id: <email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <1337518821.4107.339.camel@deadeye> (Ben Hutchings's message of "Sun, 20 May 2012 14:00:21 +0100")
- References: <1337480175.4107.271.camel@deadeye> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <1337518821.4107.339.camel@deadeye>
Ben Hutchings <email@example.com> writes:
> On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 11:27 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Ben Hutchings <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> > Eventually (wheezy+2? +3?) we would stop building a kernel package for
>> > i386.
>> As in drop the i386 arch?
> No, keep i386 userland only. Though we might consider reducing even
> that to a 'partial architecture' that has only libraries (similar to
> ia32-libs today, only cleaner).
Which basically means i386 is droped but we still support 32bit stuff
Isn't there still a large demand for i386 in the industry/embedded