On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 03:24:02AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > /tmp 8,0G 60M 8,0G 1% /tmp > > Does this count as "large files"? > > As "a lot of small-only files"? > > > Exactly how is this a practical explanation and example? :/ > Are you saying that in *your case* /tmp is almost unused? I'm saying that 60M is a substantial amount which still may be not called "large". -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature