Re: Moving /tmp to tmpfs makes it useless
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> for small files, and in that case, it's faster. In reality, it's
> not that much faster, thanks to Linux caching of the filesystem,
Under heavy filesystem IO load, yes it is. By several orders of magnitude.
> the point. Maybe we should add a /small-files-on-tmpfs (choose
> a better name, of course...) folder so that apps know what to do,
> that'd be a lot more graceful than just switching to whole /tmp
> to tmpfs without any app knowing about it.
Nice idea, but it would be worthless.
In fact it is the other way. We have /var/tmp for the large file since
about forever, and important platforms that have /tmp in memory since the
early 2000's (Solaris)....
And that STILL wasn't enough for people to not screw it up and dump large
files in /tmp.
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot