Re: BTS and qa.debian.org strangeness
Hi Ben,
thanks for the answers, but ...
On Mo, 14 Mai 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > * bug 670494 filed against ptex-bin, which is currently maintained
> > by debian-tex-maint mailing list, but the bug report was sent
> > (long after take over) to the old maintainer, so we missed it
> >
> > * bug 672491 same case with old texpower maintainer
>
> Looks like a problem of confusion between binary and source package
> names. Yes, you maintain that binary package now, but not the source
> package of the same name.
Right, but a bug reported against the bin package should be sent to
the debian-tex-maint list.
> > * package.qa.debian.org page is outdated and lists old versions
> > as currently included
>
> The ptex-bin source package is still present in unstable on
> debian-ports.
No, I mean the versions of texlive-* in unstable:
I see on the QA package:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=preining@debian.org
texlive-doc/extra/lang/base 2011.20120424-1
but an
apt-cache texlive-base
shows me:
texlive-base:
Installed: 2011.20120511-1
Candidate: 2011.20120511-1
Version table:
*** 2011.20120511-1 0
499 file:/src/TeX/debian/people/TeX/ unstable/ Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
2011.20120509-1 0
499 http://ftp.nara.wide.ad.jp/debian/ sid/main amd64 Packages
2011.20120511-1 is my test version here
But 2011.20120509-1 is in the archive, definitely, but the QA pages still
lists 2011.20120424-1.
And this since 1 week or so since 20120509.
So the QA pages are borked at the moment.
Best wishes
Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norbert Preining preining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MELTON CONSTABLE (n.)
A patent anti-wrinkle cream which policemen wear to keep themselves
looking young.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
Reply to: