[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Version for a returning package



On Sunday, May 13, 2012 06:28:03, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-05-13 at 11:49am, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Mike Hommey, le Sun 13 May 2012 11:16:13 +0200, a écrit :
> > > The versions they had by then had an epoch. Supposedly, to make the
> > > new versions greater than these, I have to add an epoch. But do I
> > > really need to care about making the new versions greater than these
> > > packages last seen 4 years ago? (sarge EOL was in 2008)
> > 
> > There are installed systems which upgraded from sarge up to squeeze
> > which can still have the old package installed. (I mean systems, not
> > machines, the system is migrated from an hdd to another to save
> > reconfiguration etc.)
> 
> Yes, some systems have packages installed that Debian do not support:
> Debian do not support keeping obsolete packages installed.
> 
> That said, it is not _forbidden_ to track version numbers of Ubuntu,
> debian-multimedia.org and obsolete Debian distro releases.

Just to let you know:
debian-multimedia.org has just switched domain names to deb-multimedia.org

I think this was done to comply with Debian's policy on domain name usage.

  -- Chris

--
Chris Knadle
Chris.Knadle@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R/0x1E759A726A9FDD74

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: