[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#632240: pylucene status



On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 03:00:11PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 20.04.2012 17:16, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 08:50:24AM -0700, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> >>You can package a modern pylucene and take over as the
> >>maintainer. Nothing
> >>would make me happier.
> >
> >Thanks a lot! I'll try to do this
> 
> Any news on that?  I'm looking at old FTBFS issues as part of the
> York BSP and right now pyluence looks like an RM candidate.

Hi,

I'm very motivated to support this package since it's optional dependency
of ReviewBoard package. I'm not DD so can't upload it. That's why I've
uploaded new version of pylucene to mentors and looking for sponsor:

Bug#670204: RFS: pylucene/3.5.0-1 ITA -- Python extension for accessing Java Lucene 

Holger Levsen will probably take a look to it in a week. He is on a
vacation now but proposed sponsorship for reviewboard in it's ITP.

-- 
WBR, Dmitry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: