Re: Bug#632240: pylucene status

To: Dmitry Nezhevenko <dion@dion.org.ua>
Cc: Jeff Breidenbach <jeff@jab.org>, <632240@bugs.debian.org>, <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#632240: pylucene status
From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 15:00:11 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] e6d09decc060853b74c9917d2f4e42df@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
In-reply-to: <20120420161656.GA8718@laptop.local>
References: <20120420123518.GG14156@laptop.local> <CAHjiUbrYMmV4eZ4bF1--PE15jWVsiQPCSoxfqipN5KjkbJSvmg@mail.gmail.com> <20120420161656.GA8718@laptop.local>

On 20.04.2012 17:16, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote:

On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 08:50:24AM -0700, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
You can package a modern pylucene and take over as the maintainer.Nothing
would make me happier.
Thanks a lot! I'll try to do this

Any news on that? I'm looking at old FTBFS issues as part of the YorkBSP and right now pyluence looks like an RM candidate.


Regards,

Adam

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug#632240: pylucene status
  - From: Dmitry Nezhevenko <dion@dion.org.ua>

Prev by Date: Re: on the use of chmod/chown in maintainer scripts
Next by Date: Re: Directory /boot/console-setup
Previous by thread: Re: on the use of chmod/chown in maintainer scripts
Next by thread: Re: Bug#632240: pylucene status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread