On May 09, Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> wrote: > In addition to that it would be nice if everyone could agree to not work > against a certain init implementation (for example by refusing to > include the startup file for that init when someone else has written one > and submited it as a wishlist bug). I definitely refuse to start including random startup files in my packages, because this conflicts with the goal of supporting only one init system. > We can return to the "which init is default" discussion when we have Except for an handful of people, who are mostly motivated by their love for the toy ports, the discussion actually was "which init system should be supported". -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature