[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Towards multi-arch: "Multi-Arch: same" file conflicts



On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 00:21:20 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:

> I also see for libopencc1 (not mine but I am watching it...)
> 
> [libopencc1 0.3.0-2]
> usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/opencc.mo
>   2c2024df5378074f4727948eb7133516 mips s390 sparc s390x powerpc
>   6a7df4d7f1f5383bd7461de8a0bb4957 kfreebsd-amd64 i386 armel armhf ia64 kfreebsd-i386 mipsel amd64
> usr/share/locale/zh_HK/LC_MESSAGES/opencc.mo
>   66224514d0c66fd34bfbf95becf8cfd0 kfreebsd-amd64 i386 armel armhf ia64 kfreebsd-i386 mipsel amd64
>   6c6698b86bbf568baefc414d178108a0 mips s390 sparc s390x powerpc
> usr/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/opencc.mo
>   a7fe10a01d59cb26825678bb6c9c2402 kfreebsd-amd64 i386 armel armhf ia64 kfreebsd-i386 mipsel amd64
>   d26ada42ce92c0cea19f4705ca89d433 mips s390 sparc s390x powerpc
> 
> I guess the solution should be the same for now.
> 
Not really.  Mixed endian installs are probably going to be uncommon
enough that it may be ok to ignore these until gettext grows a
command-line flag to specify endianness of the .mo files it spits out.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: