[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Unofficial repositories on 'debian' domains

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Milan P. Stanic <mps@arvanta.net> wrote:
> For me d-m.o was (and still is) valuable resource.
> Some codecs missing in Debian packages because of the policy (I don't
> blame Debian for that) and in that case d-m.o is best option for me
> because I don't want/have time to package it from the source.

Out of curiousity, what codecs do you miss in the official debian packages?


Reply to: