Re: Default display manager should not be gdm3

[Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no>]

Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> writes:

> This feature was in squeeze and so far we didn’t reinstate it in 3.x on
> upstream request. This is because they complained people used this
> feature to shoot themselves in the foot and then accused gdm of being
> broken. 

So they choose to break gdm and ignore all those now *rightfully*
accusing gdm of being broken?

That makes no sense at all.

I'm not going to call it crazy.  It's merely insane.


Bjørn