Re: Default display manager should not be gdm3
Josselin Mouette <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> This feature was in squeeze and so far we didn’t reinstate it in 3.x on
> upstream request. This is because they complained people used this
> feature to shoot themselves in the foot and then accused gdm of being
So they choose to break gdm and ignore all those now *rightfully*
accusing gdm of being broken?
That makes no sense at all.
I'm not going to call it crazy. It's merely insane.