Re: upstart: please update to latest upstream version
Peter Samuelson <email@example.com> writes:
> Eh, it's only a problem if the upstart maintainers in Debian refuse to
> accept work (via either BTS patches, or done directly by comaintainers)
> that upstream will not also accept.
I don't really want Debian to be in the position of forking its own init
system if we can avoid it.
> Also, the only practical way this differs from the situation with
> software from either the Free Software Foundation or the Apache Software
> Foundation seems to be that, oddly, more people think Canonical is evil
> than think the FSF and ASF are evil.
We're in a similar position with lots of other packages. Puppet is
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>