[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Patch Tagging Guidelines: DEP-3 moved to ACCEPTED status

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 02:49:55PM +0000, Jon Dowland wrote:
> Who should have that authority, then? The DEP-0 proposers?  Since the whole DEP
> process itself is  still in CANDIDATE, we could end up in an interesting
> situation if/when it comes to migrate *that* to ACCEPTED ☺
> DEP-0 merely says
> > consensus exists that the implementation has been a success
> Perhaps that needs unpacking.

You're probably right ... but let's resist the temptation of caring more
about processes than substance.

Does anyone have further comments about DEP-3?  If so, please state
them.  Otherwise, let's forget about the process details (no matter if
they could have been better or not) and rejoice for a nice standard way
of adding useful metadata to patches in the Debian archive.

Stefano Zacchiroli     zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} . o .
Maître de conférences   ......   http://upsilon.cc/zack   ......   . . o
Debian Project Leader    .......   @zack on identi.ca   .......    o o o
« the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: