[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#655723: ITP: stapler-adjunct-codemirror -- Codemirror javascript library for use with the stapler HTTP request handling engine



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi Jonas

On 13/01/12 16:12, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> This library provides a JavaScript based codemirror source code
>> visualisation
>>> component for embedding in web applications using the stapler
>>> HTTP request handling engine.
> How is this different from Codemirror itself?
> 
> Upstream README.md only has the following:
> 
>>> This adjunct package contains CodeMirror library with some
>>> small modifications.

This package patches and plugs Codemirror into the Java based stapler
HTTP request handling engine; as such its not pure codemirror and is
fixed to a specific version for compatibility.

> 
> Codemirror is not yet in Debian as a separate package, but is
> shipped with both piwigo and ipython-notebook, and is a dependency
> of pending librdf-endpoint-perl.
> 
> Would be nice if yet another code duplication could be avoided.

Agreed (it would be nice is someone could pick this up - I noticed the
RFP); I did this with stapler-adjunct-timeline which picks up the
libjs-timeline package for the actual javascript components; however
this is only a build time dependency; there is not easy way to make
use of the javascript library at runtime due to the way that Java
jar/war's etc... work.

Thanks for the feedback

Cheers

James

- -- 
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPEFCzAAoJEL/srsug59jDzJYQAM3+EtUzg/Xggn/71IWJAmZw
NArLI74K7ZA9Mlc4qqV3hZb2TV+7Iz3/O4E1V3ShOxP4mMX5tQQW7b8TMZ8bhdbb
OpzaCdGOVB+u1s5MrLYZSvPDGaaclDszpHlKN179CCuheqe2gILCHqHSXES1sMjz
Warp1O1+o4lyvzWDyLZUKdKITNzDjLMIvX7Q0HPd8x3oSCOi+3QrBMjl6fqdmgjg
ZAWW9Q7DAV6jfL2r1TbqOCel59JipJRZSGJsajaJcxd/ZMNV+H8P577UZ9H4KvSj
LpYPexqG0pCm1IlcIvLfaQ1dgoQseYVDfSTuDr4pPDHabRgWpCzH4bJCdzZ+PltS
c3WOpnNvhxEF2n3s+udC1cRzxNPEC2r0ZHyFSklRMAVhiF1rgNrn+YbfPsMY08Ju
AKtmsaBc1bvjblS228cSXx5hPbrIqLfhL3F3TpvbDR3Ry9rX5GO4ViD6hSfOniMo
R1EbEhBvl3KmlU7F5voCLLokS0qnFW54FYcQcK44LtybcQXOx1F1pxBca2le2fEi
uu22ybSie2qHcNl6ny5kSU5Qs2RFrAiV/8/cKqSkujmgyzURx2IWMaII9AO5mdEa
9hYaaDwm5rHjUcs9cvApUgKYnOnAVMiNLVOsq4UQa3Cw3+Q1kyt2nf2OIYxDBx8L
pLSWGldtpVt2PMvQrnEb
=XH0R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: