On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:42:07AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > > I'd like to point out that any resulting build failures are quite easy > > to fix: either > > (a) contact package upstream for boost 1.48 changes; or > > It is? #652681 doesn't look like it. I'll just note that an Internal Compiler Error is always a bug in the compiler, by definition. It may be true that boost exposed it, but boost is not the cause of the compiler bug. It would be helpful if you provided more details for the gcc folks. > Will 1.46 be around long enough that reverting to 1.46 is an option there? Absolutely, 1.46 is an option. That's why I suggested it. Debian has been releasing with at least two boost versions for a while now. The less-up-to-date version is often dictated by needs of other packages, such as libreoffice. > At least libreoffice is affected by http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652784. > The upstream bug reports a "one-liner" fix of building with "-std=c++0x". Does that work for Debian? Cheers, -Steve
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature