On Dec 07, Stephan Seitz <stse+debian@fsing.rootsland.net> wrote: > But as was seen in the last discussion, not everyone *has* an > initramfs, because it is not needed in many cases or sometimes even > not supported on the platform. And as was seen, most of these setups can be modified to support this scheme. I also have a few ideas about how to support systems whose boot loaders do not support loading an initramfs, does anybody have a list of them? But still, this does not change the original question: how will we deal with these significant upstream changes in many important packages. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature