On 11-06-07 at 12:54pm, Vincent Danjean wrote: > On 05/06/2011 07:39, Vincent Bernat wrote: > > On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 21:54:11 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > >> What I do is use upstream provided tarballs, then put aside > >> autotools-generated files, then autogenerate myself, and in the > >> clean rule put back the upstream-provided files (because I want not > >> only minimal required build routines idempotent but also building > >> with git-buildpackage). > > > > In the clean rules, you can just delete those autogenerated files. > > If you do not want git-buildpackage to complain (of > "not committed changes"), you need to restore them. > > I often use this in my rules: > clean: > [...] > # if this is a git repository, restore removed files that would have > # been ignored by dpkg-source > -test -d .git && git checkout -- $$(git status | \ > sed -e '/^#[[:space:]]*deleted:[[:space:]]*/s/^#[[:space:]]*deleted:[[:space:]]*//p;d' | \ > grep -v '^debian/') I strongly believe Debian packaging rules should always behave the same - at least the main rules required by Debian Policy. Therefore I dislike patterns like above, which behaves different based on the presence of some files in source during build! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature