Re: Anonymous read-only access and Vcs-* [Re: Alioth status update, take 3]
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Anonymous read-only access and Vcs-* [Re: Alioth status update, take 3]
- From: Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de>
- Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 10:40:22 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 4DE89DF6.9070602@bzed.de>
- In-reply-to: <87oc2qqa56.fsf@qurzaw.varnish-software.com>
- References: <87boyt40ln.fsf@mirexpress.internal.placard.fr.eu.org> <4DDCDDF3.2070601@debian.org> <20110525112001.GB2368@jamessan.com> <201105250757.25299.debian@kitterman.com> <87oc2qqa56.fsf@qurzaw.varnish-software.com>
On 05/26/2011 07:54 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Scott Kitterman
>
> | Was there some discussion of this with Alioth users before it got
> | changed?
>
> No.
>
> And while I apologise for the problems we've had with the migration, I'd
> like to ask people to just accept some of the changes we've made even
> though you think it makes URLs uglier. They're done to avoid cyclic
> dependencies between services.
Please explain that. I can't see how a cyclic dependency could happen
there. And I still think loosing the old names is a very annoying PITA.
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprints: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
Reply to: