Re: Can insserv made better?
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Mike Bird <mgb-debian@yosemite.net> wrote:
> I have looked at the release notes, what little documentation there
> is, and much but not all of the source code.
>
> It would certainly help if a warning were included in the release
> notes but the most critical fix is to the misleading statement in
> sysv-rc.postinst that enabling insserv is "recommended" with no
> warning about the potential adverse consequences.
If insserv meses up so bad, shouldn't it be able to detect that things
will go wrong too?
Got a concrete example of a case that fails?
Olaf
Reply to: