On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 08:54:29AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 27 décembre 2011 à 08:53 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit :Le lundi 26 décembre 2011 à 17:08 -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit : > If someone would give even *one* example where something legitimately needed > by a udev rule could not be moved from /usr to / without breaking interfaces > or otherwise complicating matters, then that would be worth discussing.Grah. I mean introducing a udev rule that calls a D-Bus service, of course.
And which D-Bus service has to be called at a early boot stage, that it can’t wait until we are leaving single user mode?
Udev doesn’t seem to have a trigger database where rules that are not able to run now can insert information, so that udev can execute these rules if they can be run. But this is a bug in udev, not a reason to force people to reconfigure their systems.
Stephan -- | Stephan Seitz E-Mail: firstname.lastname@example.org | | PGP Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/pgp.html |
Description: Digital signature