Re: from / to /usr/: a summary
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Philip Hands wrote:
> It would be nice to know a) which packages are actually likely to be
> involved, and what sort of breakage we might expect to see if one were
> foolish enough to carry on with a separate /usr, and what sorts of
> separate /usr might provoke that breakage.
The package that started the thread was udev, there are examples of
libs that need to be in /lib in the beginning of #652011.