Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor
From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:19:03 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20111122201903.GF4113@type>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4ECBF168.7080500@cox.net>
References: <[🔎] 1321742531.2885.227.camel@deadeye> <[🔎] 20171.53784.119523.574726@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] 20111122172828.GA31999@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> <[🔎] m31ut0gh49.fsf@neo.luffy.cx> <[🔎] 4ECBF168.7080500@cox.net>

John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell, le Tue 22 Nov 2011 14:00:56 -0500, a écrit :
> CMOV saves 1 clock + 1 dword.

Errr, and branch misprediction?

Samuel

Reply to:

References:
- Increasing minimum 'i386' processor
  - From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
- Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor
  - From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
- Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor
  - From: Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org>
- Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor
  - From: "John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell" <johnandsara2@cox.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Is anyone using the Units program in a script?
Next by Date: Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor
Previous by thread: Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor
Next by thread: Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread