Re: /tmp as tmpfs and consequence for imaging software
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On 16/11/11 11:37, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Assuming you have increased your SWAP by the size of the tmpfs to
>> compensate for /tmp now using RAM+SWAP you can only ever get that effect
>> in cases where the OOMKiller would have already been triggered with /tmp
>> on disk.
> We are talking about the defaults... would the installer by default
> increase the swap by the same size of the tmpfs?
I would hope so.
The installer could even have a different partitioning templates for
small tmpfs (no swap), large tmpfs (large swap) or real filesystem.